HOW IGNORANT IS THIS?

Seems like O'Reilly is just simply an idiot, or 'a simple man' as he puts it, what he really meant to say, 'a simpleton'.

He somehow believes that 'fair' reporting somehow requires an equal number of reports pro and con, as he complains that out of thousands of reports on the tea party love fest only two were positive, TWO...

Let's put this another way. If a hundred people make unfavorable comments on scatology, to be fair, there must be about 100 people who report favorably. How reasonable is this?

Back to the teabaggers - there just was not much, if anything good to report about that event, except by die-hard teabaggers who appear deranged when they promote no taxes, large military, reducing deficits and the Reagan/Bush national debt. Add to that the requirement they seek, that gives people a voucher, paid for by taxpayers to pay for health insurance by giving 30% of that amount to insurance company executive salaries, profits and dividends to their stock owners.